<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Catcher's Blog - Latest Comments in Where We Stand: Part 1 - Catcher&amp;#8217;s Roles</title><link>http://catchersblog.disqus.com/</link><description>A Braves blog by a huge Braves fan. </description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:51:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Where We Stand: Part 1 - Catcher&amp;#8217;s Roles</title><link>http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-3436511</link><description>Yeah I agree, and I'm happy with either Lopez or Sammons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey Bishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where We Stand: Part 1 - Catcher&amp;#8217;s Roles</title><link>http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-3436510</link><description>Basically what I was saying. Lopez will probably get it if he performs well, if not then Sammons most likely will. I don't look for Pena to get it either. But we'll have to see what happens, I guess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leah</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where We Stand: Part 1 - Catcher&amp;#8217;s Roles</title><link>http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-3436509</link><description>Nice. Here's a summary of what my article would look like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clint Sammons: Really good, but needs to develop more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pena: Sucks at defense. Not the guy for backup role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Miller: Just plain sucks. Not thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lopez: If he performs well in Spring Training, he's your man. He's a low risk guy, so why not?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corey Bishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:22:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>